1. Welcome to the Recumbent Riders International forums.
    You are currently viewing the discussion boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post and reply to topics, communicate privately with other members, download/upload content and access other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please,
    Join the community today!
    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

New Crime: DWT- Driving While Texting

Discussion in 'Health and Safety' started by NewsBot, Apr 17, 2007.  |  Print Topic

  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot Fetching Recumbent News

    Name:
    I am a Robot
    ZDnet had an article last January about a new crime called DWT (driving while Texting).
    It's hard to believe that people drive with their Blackberries propped up on the steering wheel and their thumbs clicking away even as they navigate the hazards of the freeway. But it must be so if a legislator feels the need to pass a law against it. Or maybe it's just a case of a freshman lawmaker looking to score points by legislating against a danger that doesn't really exist.

    In any case, Arizona state Rep. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, wants to create the crime of DWT, or driving while texting, reports the Arizona Star. He claims there's so much in-car texting going on that the roads are unsafe.
    The fines: $50 if you're caught texting, $200 if you're in an accident. It's just as illegal to read a text as to write one.
    Naturally, the cellphone companies and internet providers are against it. But they might have a point.

    "People ought to be self-sufficient enough that government shouldn't have to tell them how to drive safely," said Susan Bitter Smith, who lobbies for several cellular companies. And she said there is no evidence text messaging is any more distracting than other things that remain legal, ranging from applying mascara to eating a cheeseburger.
    Actually, there are no facts that people do DWT - Farley has anecodtes only. But as distractions go, it's a good one. And AAA reports distracted drivers are more dangerous than drunk drivers. Presumably, a texting, drunk driver would be a madman on the road.

    Farley said he doesn't expect police to go out and actively look for motorists whose thumbs aren't where they're supposed to be. In fact, Farley said his measure is written so that the only time drivers would be cited is if they were in an accident or stopped for some other reason.But Farley said he expects just putting the law on the books will prompt 80 percent of the people who do it to stop.
    The American Automobile Association reports distracted drivers are more dangerous than drunk drivers.

    Are texting drivers more distracted than drivers who prop a book on the steering wheel and read while driving?

    Maybe Arizona should go after other distracted drivers rather than just drivers who send text messages on their cell phones while driving.

    taken from http://tinyurl.com/2235u2
     
  2. Geyatautsilvsgi

    Geyatautsilvsgi Supporter

    Region:
    SouthEast
    State/Country:
    TN
    City:
    Seymour
    Ride:
    ?
    Name:
    Geyatautsilvsgi
    Now that IS an interesting article. Although I have seen people doing much worse or much more "sensual" activities other than applying mascara, gabbing on a cell phone etc. Those activities can be VERY distracting and dangerous as people close their eyes for the "moment" ;) Anyway, government doesn't need to get involved. Get proof FIRST. Just my two cents.

    HB Buzz'n By...
     

Share This Page